![]() Do you have an old roll of film you'd like to have developed? Click Here for more information & pricing. |
|||||||||
|
Film: Kodak Verichrome Pan 116 Format Exp Date: --- Developed: July 13, 2006 Camera: --- Location: --- Notes: --- |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Tri-X 400 620 Format Exp Date: --- Developed: June 24, 2006 Camera: --- Location: --- Notes: This film appears to have become moist/wet at some point as the film had to be literally peeled off the backing paper - leaving a very "splotchy" negative. Other than that, the negatives appear quite good. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Kodak Kodacolor II - 127 Format Exp Date: December 1977 Developed: July 27, 2006 Camera: Baby Brownie Special Location: Temple, TX Notes: This roll had been expired for 29 years when it was shot on July 26, 2006. As you can see, the frame numbers are boldly visible on the negatives which were scanned as a continuous piece to illustrate what can occur with color film even if an expired roll of film is exposed only 1 day prior to developing. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Kodak Verichrome Pan 116 Format Exp Date: --- Developed: July 13, 2006 Camera: Kodak No. 1A Pocket Location: --- Notes: --- |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Kodacolor II 126 Format (Processed with our Guaranteed Color Process) Exp Date: --- Developed: July 29, 2006 Camera: Instamatic X-15 Location: --- Notes: --- |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Kodacolor-X 120 Format (Processed as B&W) Exp Date: --- Developed: June 23, 2006 Camera: A box camera. The manufacturer is unknown as the carry strap was missing. Location: --- Notes: The paper backing was wrinkled on one side of the spool. This was the cause of a light leak on the left side of each negative. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Kodacolor VRG 200 126 Cartridge (Processed as B&W) Exp Date: --- Developed: July 13, 2006 Camera: Anscomatic 726 Location: --- Notes: --- |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Panchromatic 127 Film (Gevapan 80?) Exp Date: 1947? Developed: June 9, 2006 Camera: Falcon Miniature (Made by Utility Mfg. Co. in New York in 1943) Location: St. Louis Area Notes: While the negatives were very dense when developed, the final results are actually pretty good. You'll note that 2 of the example images shown below have overlapped frames. This is typical of this camera as it has 2 film viewports in the back and if you advance the film to show the same frame # in the 2nd viewport, it will overlap the frames. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Kodak Verichrome Pan 127 Exp Date: ? Developed: June 2, 2006 Camera: Kodak Hawkeye Flashfun Outfit Notes: It appears that the camera back was opened at some point and only a single frame was left unfogged. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Walgreen's 120 All Purpose Film (Gevapan 100?) Exp Date: June 67 Developed: June 3, 2006 Camera: Unknown - Purchased 3 rolls of this film in a box. Location: Film was found in some old furniture in Madisonville, KY. But, the owner's had moved from Chicago several years earlier. Notes: This film has obviously been stored under very harsh conditions and the images were very difficult to recover. This roll also shows severe scratching of the emulsion side of the negative. Even the images on the backing paper have bled through to the film - leaving the frame #'s and warning dots clearly visible. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Walgreen's 120 All Purpose Film (Gevapan 100?) Exp Date: June 67 Developed: June 4, 2006 Camera: Unknown - Purchased 3 rolls of this film in a box. Location: Film was found in some old furniture in Madisonville, KY. But, the owner's had moved from Chicago several years earlier. Notes: This film has obviously been stored under very harsh conditions and the images were very difficult to recover. This roll also shows severe scratching of the emulsion side of the negative. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Film: Walgreen's 120 All Purpose Film (Gevapan 80?) Exp Date: June 67 Developed: June 7, 2006 Camera: Unknown - Purchased 3 rolls of this film in a box. Location: Film was found in some old furniture in Madisonville, KY. But, the owner's had moved from Chicago several years earlier. Notes: This film has obviously been stored under very harsh conditions and the images were very difficult to recover. This roll also shows severe scratching of the emulsion side of the negative along with what appears to be a significant light leak along the entire left side of every frame. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||